…is the less-than-catchy title of my first paper, to appear in the Journal of Algebra. With suitable credentials it can be accessed online through ScienceDirect, otherwise there’s a preprint on the arXiv which is a close approximation. The exact details of the print edition are still being finalised; I should have a limited supply of offprints for the truly keen.

The paper covers the classification of the cyclotomic matrices/graphs for four of the six rings I considered in my thesis, but there have been some improvements to the methods. In particular, the proof that any maximal cyclotomic graph over those rings has all vertices of weighted degree four has been substantially streamlined; and there’s an explicit proof that any cyclotomic graph is contained in a maximal one. A follow-up paper proving Lehmer’s conjecture for polynomials arising from such graphs over the same rings is in preparation.

I’m continuing to tour my Cyclotomic Matrices and Graphs talk; today I presented it at the University of Warwick. Here’s the latest and greatest iteration of the slides, mostly unchanged except for the current state of the computer search for minimal noncyclotomics of at most ten vertices. I’d hoped to finish that this month, but the final round of growing in the most general case over the gaussian integers has progressed much slower than I expected. Given that some batches finished in a twentieth of the wall time others have consumed so far, I’m suspecting the reasons may be non-mathematical. However, I have finished the eisenstein integer case, and there are four new classes with Mahler measure less than 1.3, with representatives given in the slides.

I spent last week in New Orleans for the Joint Mathematics Meetings 2011. I’d made a rather last minute booking after noticing a couple of sessions could be useful, and hadn’t quite grasped the scale of the event. I’d normally think of 200 mathematicians as a large gathering, but the JMM had over six thousand participants and at peak more than thirty parallel sessions to choose between… the densely typed book of abstracts runs to 450 pages! Hence, as well as the content that justifies dipping into my travel budget, I was able to see a wide range of talks purely out of curiosity. So, partly for my own future convenience, and partly to give some indication of the range available, I thought I’d note down everything I attended. As that was 42 talks – plus an art exhibition and a film – this post got rather long, so the rest is beneath the cut.

I’m speaking this afternoon at the Heilbronn Seminar in Bristol: my slides are available here. This is essentially (up to permutation, and modulo errors!) the talk I gave at Royal Holloway in October, although the last few slides have been replaced with a result I’ve found since then.

I try to avoid technical details of proofs in my talks, and to make the slides intelligible even if you weren’t there, so if you just want the motivation for, or results of, my PhD work then this is probably the best place to look. For all the proofs in tedious detail, there’s my thesis itself. I’ve since come up with a much more compact proof of the results in Chapter 5, which has lead to this draft paper classifying all cyclotomic L-graphs for d=-15,-11,-7 and -2: it’s far more compact than the corresponding sections of my thesis, but perhaps at the price of readability!

If you’d just like to know more about Mahler measure and Lehmer’s problem in general, then I’d recommend this survey by Chris Smyth. For various records related to small Mahler measure, see Mossinghof’s tables.

The church of St Mary Redcliffe is a stone’s throw from my new home in Bristol, and with its soaring gothic architecture is well worth including on any visit to the city. But for a mathematical tourist there’s an extra treat: the ‘chaotic pendulum’ in the north transept.

The pendulum could be considered the symbol of predictability and regularity, serving as the essential component of timekeeping devices for hundreds of years. Yet simple modifications yield devices that instead exhibit chaotic behaviour, the typical example being the double pendulum, where one pendulum is attached to the end of another. The chaotic pendulum at St Mary’s is believed to be unique in design: water is continually pumped into the crossbeam, causing it to tip one way or the other to let it flow out again; but it’s not generally possible to predict which way it’ll go next!

It’s important to note that this isn’t because the motion is random: there are rules governing its behaviour, and if you could return the chaotic pendulum to exactly the same state as it was at the start of the video, then it’d do exactly the same again. However, in chaotic systems tiny changes can be amplified into disproportionate effects, whilst large changes might have no impact. This leads to what is known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Think of catching a train, where if you’re a second early then you arrive at your destination on time, but if you’re a second late you’ll have to wait for the next one, so your two second delay grows into half an hour. On the other hand, whether you arrive at the station ten minutes or ten seconds early makes no difference to when you arrive at the other end. Thus your arrival time at the destination depends on your arrival time at the station in a highly non-linear way.

So if your attempt to reset the chaotic pendulum were even slightly flawed, then the video would be useless for making predictions. Similarly, even if you could build a completely accurate mathematical model, any readings taken from the real pendulum would contain errors, and so after a while the predictions of the model would diverge from the real behaviour. Fortunately for a pure mathematician like myself it’s more interesting to build that model, capturing the essence of all chaotic pendulums, than to be able to predict the activities of a single example!

The Clifton scientific trust has this to say about the lessons that can be drawn from the chaotic pendulum:

Some people look to science for certainties on which to base their lives. Increasingly we realise our knowledge can never provide certainty, even for this simple machine. The world is a more wonderful and a more surprising place than we could have imagined.

I’d agree with their conclusion, but not for their reasons… A truly random world, for example, would be constantly surprising. What’s wonderful about ours is that seemingly complicated phenomena can be described by simple rules – complexity can emerge from the interaction of otherwise easy-to-understand parts, rather than requiring some irreducibly complex explanation (such as a creator). Whilst the existence of chaos might restrict our ability to predict, it shouldn’t discourage us from trying to explain.

I shall soon be delivering the final copies of my thesis to the University of Edinburgh, who will in time make it available in both hard copy and electronically. But for convenience, you can already obtain the pdf version here.

Today I successfully defended my PhD thesis, Cyclotomic Matrices and Graphs. There are of course numerous corrections to be made, but I hope to have those done within the next couple of weeks and to make the final version available online. Until then, here is the abstract:

We generalise the study of cyclotomic matrices – those with all eigenvalues in the interval [-2,2] – from symmetric rational integer matrices to Hermitian matrices with entries from rings of integers of imaginary quadratic fields. As in the rational integer case, a corresponding graph-like structure is defined.

We introduce the notion of `4-cyclotomic’ matrices and graphs, prove that they are necessarily maximal cyclotomic, and classify all such objects up to equivalence. The six rings of integers for Q(√(d)) for d=-1, -2, -3, -7, -11, -15 give rise to examples not found in the rational-integer case; in four (d=-1, -2, -3, -7) we recover infinite families as well as sporadic cases.

For d=-15, -11, -7, -2, we demonstrate that a maximal cyclotomic graph is necessarily 4-cyclotomic and thus the presented classification determines all cyclotomic matrices/graphs for those fields. For the same values of d we then identify the minimal noncyclotomic graphs and determine their Mahler measures; no such graph has Mahler measure less than 1.35 unless it admits a rational-integer representative.

I’ve recently returned from my second ‘Young Researchers in Mathematics’ event in Cambridge, a city I never tire of visiting. At over eight hundred years old, Cambridge University has more history than some countries, so there are plenty of mathematical connections to be found as a result- I thought I’d share just a few of them today.

The Mathematical Bridge

As I wrote last time about a Mathematical River, it seems sensible to start with this ‘Mathematical Bridge’! Popular myth asserts that the original design was so clever that it was held together simply by gravity, a feat attributed to anyone from undergraduate students to Isaac Newton, depending on who’s telling the tale. But (the story goes) when perplexed Fellows dismantled the bridge in an attempt to understand its construction, they were unable to put it back together again without resorting to using the nuts and bolts which can be seen today. Sadly, the bolts have always been needed, although as first built (in 1749) they were invisible to those crossing the bridge – and it is at least true that it didn’t require any nails!

Trinity College, Cambridge

It’s unlikely, then, that Newton had a hand in the mathematical bridge, since he died twenty years before it’s construction, but that won’t dent his mathematical legacy too much. Trinity College has always had a strong mathematical reputation, admitting almost a fifth of undergraduates in the subject (of 31 colleges in total), with Newton easily their most famous predecessor. He measured the speed of sound in one of the courtyards; the library holds his annotated first edition of Principia Mathematica (and a lock of his hair!); and the tree outside the main gate is claimed to be a descendant of his famous apple tree.

Centre for Mathematical Sciences

Until the mid-20th century, there was no central mathematics department, and instead work was done in the colleges. Today, however, research activity is concentrated at the Centre for Mathematical Sciences. It’s often joked that to find the mathematics department at a university you should look for the ugliest building, but the CMS, which opened in 2003, is a world away from 60s brutalist concrete. The ‘low energy’ design exploits natural ventilation to control the internal environment, and it’s green in a more literal sense too, with the main core having a grass roof. But it’s clearly a building meant for mathematicians, as the first things the architects were asked to design were the coffee rooms. Like the city it resides in, it’s a wonderful place to contemplate mathematics, and I hope I’ll be back again next year.

(Cross-posted to the frontpage)
Just a quick note to mention two talks from the Edinburgh International Science Festival, which my flatmate chaired and I took some photos at: Marcus du Sautoy’s The Num8er My5teries and Ian Stewart’s Cows in the Maze. Summaries, courtesy of Haggis the Sheep, can be found here and here respectively.

At the end of March I was in Cambridge for Young Researchers in Mathematics. Personal highlights include Gowers’ keynote, the plenary by Michael Atiyah, and having my own work mentioned in Gary Greaves’ talk. Having spent a lot of time recently thinking about a very small section of number theory, it was good to be able to attend something multidisciplinary, giving me the opportunity to hear about some algebraic geometry, combinatorics and string theory too. That broader diet looks set to continue this week- I’m back in Edinburgh for the British Mathematical Colloquium and British Applied Mathematics Colloquium, featuring up to a dozen splinter sessions at a time (this afternoon I opted for history of mathematics). The Edinburgh International Science Festival is also running in April, and as part of that I’ll be at the Royal Society tomorrow for Meet the Mathematicians, where I’m part of the careers panel. Busy times!